Adoption intelligence¶
Use this guide to interpret aggregated AI-usage patterns by team, function, role, and tenure band. Adoption intelligence reuses the attributed usage graph, but it reports privacy-preserving cohorts, never individual scores. Each result names its signal basis, threshold, time basis, source coverage, and freshness.
Measured cohorts, bounded interpretation
Adoption intelligence is the second projection of the same attribution graph. The onboarding capability reports the measured cohort metrics on this page. Any claim that a signal predicts a later business outcome requires validation against that tenant’s own outcome data. All figures are privacy-preserving cohorts; there is no individual scoring.
Use this capability¶
- Confirm the relevant connectors are current and review the coverage state.
- Choose a cohort dimension and time basis.
- Read the signal basis and active-adopter threshold beside the result.
- Treat a visibility gap as missing evidence, not low adoption.
- Export the signed cohort report only after its suppression and access checks pass.
Cohort-only, by design¶
Adoption intelligence is cohort-only. Venturi reports adoption by group (team, function, role, or tenure band) and applies a strict minimum-cohort rule:
Minimum cohort size: k = 5
No cohort smaller than 5 members is ever displayed. Sub-k cohorts are
suppressed and rolled up into their parent unit, and Venturi blocks
reconstruction of an individual by differencing across overlapping cohorts.
This rule holds across dashboards, shared views, and exports; sharing a view
never reveals a suppressed cohort to a recipient.
This is not a configuration toggle. Individual-level adoption views do not exist, and k=5 is enforced server-side across dashboards, API, exports, filters, drill-downs, and shared views.
- No emotion or sentiment inference. Venturi measures usage patterns, not feelings, and performs no emotion inference of any kind.
The cohort-only posture is what keeps adoption intelligence out of profiling entirely. Venturi includes the supporting DPIA template and works-council pack in the onboarding diligence pack so your privacy and works-council reviews start with the right materials in hand.
Access is role-gated and auditable¶
Adoption views are reachable only through a dedicated Workforce-Data role, assigned to authorized workforce-data reviewers. The role is read-only with respect to attribution and policies, and like every grant in Venturi it is scoped, auditable, and fails closed: if a role isn’t explicitly granted the workforce-data scope, the views simply aren’t reachable.
When a workforce cohort is shared or appears in a report, it re-renders under each recipient’s own access: a non-workforce recipient sees the cohort suppressed or rolled up, and EU-gated rows stay hidden. Sharing never escalates privilege.
What the signals mean¶
Every adoption signal carries its basis so you can weigh it honestly:
| Signal basis | What it reflects |
|---|---|
| Direct | Observed usage from request-level events or first-party logs. |
| Inferred | Adoption inferred from attributed activity where direct signal is partial. |
| Estimated | A weaker, clearly-marked signal where coverage is thin. |
Adoption is confidence-normalized, and the dashboard distinguishes operational lag from observability lag, so “low adoption” is never confused with “a visibility gap.” If a team looks quiet because a connector is stale rather than because they stopped using AI, Venturi tells you which it is.
Decision evidence¶
Every program-ROI figure carries the assumption it rests on, every readiness signal names its baseline, and the export preserves the cohort metrics, signal mix, privacy gates, and calculation metadata in 1 signed artifact.
ROI cut-lines¶
There is no hidden definition of “active.” Wherever you see a cost per active adopter, a concentration figure, or an adoption trajectory, the surface shows the active-adopter threshold in effect right beside it, labeled by where it came from:
| Threshold provenance | What it means |
|---|---|
| Default (illustrative) | A starting threshold Venturi ships so the figure is never blank, clearly marked as not yet tuned to you. |
| Customer-calibrated | A threshold you set for your organization, so “active” means what your leadership agreed it means. |
Each figure also shows a threshold-sensitivity band: the same number recomputed at the brackets either side of the active line, so you can see at a glance whether the result is robust or balanced on a knife-edge. When you change the threshold, that change is a recorded calibration event: who changed it, the old value, the new value, the basis, and when, so “active” never shifts silently underneath a previously-reported number. Ask “what counts as active?” and the answer is on the slide.
Readiness baselines¶
The organizational-readiness signal is never a bare “gap.” It is measured against a named, declared expectation baseline; the surface states the baseline’s method, its inputs, and its confidence. Every cell that reads lower than predicted shows you all four values together:
- the observed value,
- the expected value,
- the baseline method that produced the expectation, and
- the confidence in that expectation.
When an expectation can’t be computed with enough confidence, the cell says so
explicitly: an expectation-unavailable state that is visibly different from
genuine low adoption and from a k = 5-suppressed cohort. Venturi never invents a
gap to fill a cell. The four values reproduce within a stated tolerance from the
same data and baseline version, so a reallocation recommendation built on “this
function is under-adopting relative to investment” is one you can stand behind
when challenged.
Substitution evidence¶
Tooling gain/loss draws a clear line between a tool simply declining and a team having switched to an unsanctioned alternative, because those are very different conversations with very different consequences.
A substitution claim is an accusation, so it must be earned
Venturi surfaces “switched to an unsanctioned alternative” only when corroborating shadow-vector evidence supports it, and that evidence is shown with its signal type and confidence (network and shadow signals are capped at 0.70, and that ceiling is on the surface). Without corroboration, you see a decline with cause unconfirmed, and where the drop lines up with reduced observability, Venturi flags possible observability lag rather than implying anyone went rogue. A board never receives an unevidenced shadow-IT accusation from Venturi.
Signed decision record¶
When you’re ready to present, Venturi produces a signed, reproducible adoption board-pack, not a dashboard screenshot. Per cohort, the pack bundles:
- the metric values themselves;
- the signal-type mix (how many Direct, Inferred, and Estimated signals stand behind each number);
- the
k = 5suppression manifest: which cohorts were suppressed or rolled up, so the privacy posture travels with the numbers; - the confidence-weighting basis and the observability-vs-operational-lag disclosure;
- the active-adopter threshold and the readiness baseline the figures rest on;
- the as-of freshness and the graph and version basis; and
- a tamper-evident signature.
Reproducible, not a snapshot
Because the live graph keeps moving, a screenshot with a date stamp can’t be
reproduced or audited later. The board-pack can: it is regenerable from the
named version, it carries the cohort-only k = 5 privacy gate and the
EU individual-level disable inside it, and its signature lets anyone confirm
it wasn’t altered after the fact. It’s the artifact your works-council and
DPIA reviews (and your board) can rely on.
Putting it to work¶
- Find the gaps. See which functions have meaningfully adopted AI and which haven’t, by cohort. Identify functions that need enablement investment.
- Track the trajectory. Watch whether adoption is growing, plateauing, or declining after an initial spike, by team, role, and tenure cohort.
- Tie spend to traction. Combine adoption cohorts with attributed cost to reason about cost per active cohort, so enablement budget follows the teams actually embedding AI.
- Report to the board. Present cohort-level adoption and ROI signal with the same confidence and provenance contract as every other Venturi number (every figure with its active-adopter threshold, every readiness signal with its baseline) and export the whole picture as a single signed, reproducible board-pack.
Related capabilities¶
- Cost attribution & chargeback: the cost projection of the same graph.
- Optimization & governance: turn adoption and spend insight into action.
- Reporting & exports: cohort dashboards and scheduled adoption reports.
- Trust & security: how privacy guarantees are enforced.